Ilford Invitational

Division C Wall Chart

Player	Round 1	Round 2	Round 3	Round 4	Round 5	Round 6	Round 7	Round 8	Round 9
1. angie andrews	299-413 replies vs. 5 0.0-1.0 -114 = -114	320-390 starts vs. 6 0.0-2.0 -70 = -184	+75 bye 1.0-2.0 +75 = -109	449-382 replies vs. 8 2.0-2.0 +67 = -42	424-359 starts vs. 9 3.0-2.0 +65 = +23	390-423 replies vs. 2 3.0-3.0 -33 = -10	360-356 starts vs. 7 4.0-3.0 +4 = -6	436-350 starts vs. 4 5.0-3.0 +86 = +80	490-227 replies vs. 2 6.0-3.0 +263 = +343	1. angie andrews
2. colin sthill	271-376 replies vs. 8 0.0-1.0 -105 = -105	362-383 starts vs. 9 0.0-2.0 -21 = -126	408-365 starts vs. 4 1.0-2.0 +43 = -83	+75 bye 2.0-2.0 +75 = -8	366-358 replies vs. 7 3.0-2.0 +8 = +0	423-390 starts vs. 1 4.0-2.0 +33 = +33	393-297 replies vs. 6 5.0-2.0 +96 = +129	378-433 starts vs. 3 5.0-3.0 -55 = +74	227-490 starts vs. 1 5.0-4.0 -263 = -189	2. colin sthill
3. Natasha Pratesi	354-261 starts vs. 7 1.0-0.0 +93 = +93	376-380 replies vs. 4 1.0-1.0 -4 = +89	349-380 replies vs. 5 1.0-2.0 -31 = +58	351-398 starts vs. 6 1.0-3.0 -47 = +11	307-392 starts vs. 8 1.0-4.0 -85 = -74	372-277 replies vs. 9 2.0-4.0 +95 = +21	+75 bye 3.0-4.0 +75 = +96	433-378 replies vs. 2 4.0-4.0 +55 = +151	374-327 starts vs. 8 5.0-4.0 +47 = +198	3. Natasha Pratesi
4. sheila anderson	317-421 replies vs. 9 0.0-1.0 -104 = -104	380-376 starts vs. 3 1.0-1.0 +4 = -100	365-408 replies vs. 2 1.0-2.0 -43 = -143	314-363 replies vs. 7 1.0-3.0 -49 = -192	+75 bye 2.0-3.0 +75 = -117	258-327 starts vs. 6 2.0-4.0 -69 = -186	357-348 starts vs. 5 3.0-4.0 +9 = -177	350-436 replies vs. 1 3.0-5.0 -86 = -263	352-387 starts vs. 7 3.0-6.0 -35 = -298	4. sheila anderson
5. jo holland	413-299 starts vs. 1 1.0-0.0 +114 = +114	75-0 replies vs. 10 2.0-0.0 +75 = +189	380-349 starts vs. 3 3.0-0.0 +31 = +220	392-318 replies vs. 9 4.0-0.0 +74 = +294	298-457 replies vs. 6 4.0-1.0 -159 = +135	333-372 starts vs. 7 4.0-2.0 -39 = +96	348-357 replies vs. 4 4.0-3.0 -9 = +87	429-315 starts vs. 8 5.0-3.0 +114 = +201	378-413 replies vs. 6 5.0-4.0 -35 = +166	5. jo holland
6. ron bucknell	75-0 starts vs. 10 1.0-0.0 +75 = +75	390-320 replies vs. 1 2.0-0.0 +70 = +145	353-328 starts vs. 8 3.0-0.0 +25 = +170	398-351 replies vs. 3 4.0-0.0 +47 = +217	457-298 starts vs. 5 5.0-0.0 +159 = +376	327-258 replies vs. 4 6.0-0.0 +69 = +445	297-393 starts vs. 2 6.0-1.0 -96 = +349	335-388 replies vs. 9 6.0-2.0 -53 = +296	413-378 starts vs. 5 7.0-2.0 +35 = +331	6. ron bucknell
7. sandra weston	261-354 replies vs. 3 0.0-1.0 -93 = -93	359-281 starts vs. 8 1.0-1.0 +78 = -15	305-407 replies vs. 9 1.0-2.0 -102 = -117	363-314 starts vs. 4 2.0-2.0 +49 = -68	358-366 starts vs. 2 2.0-3.0 -8 = -76	372-333 replies vs. 5 3.0-3.0 +39 = -37	356-360 replies vs. 1 3.0-4.0 -4 = -41	+75 bye 4.0-4.0 +75 = +34	387-352 replies vs. 4 5.0-4.0 +35 = +69	7. sandra weston
8. dan smith	376-271 starts vs. 2 1.0-0.0 +105 = +105	281-359 replies vs. 7 1.0-1.0 -78 = +27	328-353 replies vs. 6 1.0-2.0 -25 = +2	382-449 starts vs. 1 1.0-3.0 -67 = -65	392-307 replies vs. 3 2.0-3.0 +85 = +20	+75 bye 3.0-3.0 +75 = +95	434-256 starts vs. 9 4.0-3.0 +178 = +273	315-429 replies vs. 5 4.0-4.0 -114 = +159	327-374 replies vs. 3 4.0-5.0 -47 = +112	8. dan smith
9. Ali Stilwell	421-317 starts vs. 4 1.0-0.0 +104 = +104	383-362 replies vs. 2 2.0-0.0 +21 = +125	407-305 starts vs. 7 3.0-0.0 +102 = +227	318-392 starts vs. 5 3.0-1.0 -74 = +153	359-424 replies vs. 1 3.0-2.0 -65 = +88	277-372 starts vs. 3 3.0-3.0 -95 = -7	256-434 replies vs. 8 3.0-4.0 -178 = -185	388-335 starts vs. 6 4.0-4.0 +53 = -132	+75 bye 5.0-4.0 +75 = -57	9. Ali Stilwell
10. jackie reid	0-75 replies vs. 6 0.0-1.0 -75 = -75	0-75 starts vs. 5 0.0-2.0 -75 = -150	-75 bye 0.0-3.0 -75 = -225	-75 bye 0.0-4.0 -75 = -300	-75 bye 0.0-5.0 -75 = -375	-75 bye 0.0-6.0 -75 = -450	-75 bye 0.0-7.0 -75 = -525	-75 bye 0.0-8.0 -75 = -600	-75 bye 0.0-9.0 -75 = -675	10. jackie reid

This report was generated by tsh version 3.310. For more information about tsh, please contact Stewart Holden or John Chew.